Modern warfare 3 should i buy

It's a Call of Duty game in name only. That is not pretty. Brian Crecente, who played a bit with the DS game before returning to its big brother on the Xbox : I always want to like these DS versions of the shooter. I've tried nearly everyone that's come out in the past three years or so. But they always struggle with graphics and controls. Shooters have come a long way on Nintendo's portable, but the lack of twin thumbsticks will forever, I think, make comfortable, enjoyable shooter play impossible on the system.

I can't recommend buying the game, even though it tries hard to deliver a Call of Duty -esque experience to the portable.

Now Call of Duty on the Playstation Vita? That I can't wait for. Elsewhere, there are complaints that the campaign is based around the same old linear action and explosive set-pieces as its predecessors. But then, what did everyone think was going to happen? That's fine — nobody can be disappointed that they bought the game and that's what's in it. Jon Hicks, editor of the Official Xbox Magazine, makes the interesting point that we may be thinking about Call of Duty in the wrong way by comparing it to other action games such as Batman or Uncharted.

As a vast annual franchise designed to appease millions of mainstream consumers, there are more relevant points of reference:.

People say they want innovation and change and difference, but in the same way that Fifa can't break out of the fact that it's a game of football, CoD is so successful now, it can't really break out of its model, it is constrained by its very form. If you consider it as a sports game it becomes more logical. If you look through the annals of gaming history the titles that do change significantly year on year are the ones that get quite heavily punished.

People like to demand change, but increasingly they then don't buy it. Rivalry has also played a part in the tribalism of the user reviews. EA has pitched its Battlefield 3 title very much against Modern Warfare, both in its advertising and in some barbed pre-release interviews — and this has fostered a factional atmosphere: gamers love a platform battle. Battlefield 3 is a phenomenal game but I'm a little bit sad that the PR for it has been at the expense of another brilliant title.

It's not great that we're back to the old Sega v Nintendo situation. And here we unearth a more insidious undercurrent: Activision is being actively punished. Last year, the co-founders of Infinity Ward, Jason West and Vince Zampella, were sacked for breaches of contract and "insubordination".

The duo immediately sued the publisher, claiming that millions in royalties were being withheld from Infinity Ward staff. Activision later counter-sued suggesting that West and Zampella were using the company's IP to broker a development deal with a rival company. Later, the dismissed twosome set up Respawn Entertainment and announced a publishing contract with EA, Activision's main rival.

Now, I've read through the papers submitted by both parties. They make complex claims and counter claims and it looks as though it is going to take many months for a US court to get to the bottom of what is an intricate corporate law case. The point is, as it stands, no one outside of the Infinity Ward or Activision knows what happened. No one, that is, except for the internet, which has sided with West and Zampella against the 'evil corporation'.

The idea of a couple of creative "Davids" taking on the Goliath of Activision is an attractive one, but it is also deeply flawed. Well, talking about an entertainment form with millions of passionate fans as a packaged goods industry isn't great — and irony doesn't work well on the internet. Even if something dark and unjust did happen at Infinity Ward, we enter troubling critical territory when the wrongs of the author, the studio or the distributor are visited upon the appraisal of their work.

Movie history is littered with despicable characters who have made astonishing films; is Melancholia any less of a work because Lars von Trier claimed to be a Nazi during his Cannes press conference?

Tying in with the contempt for Activision is a distrust for the reviewers themselves. Several comments beneath my own review for Modern Warfare 3 had to be removed because they were essentially libellous. And this has happened hand-in-hand with the rise of the internet and the democratisation of opinion. Zombies became a phenomenon, and Treyarch's calling card every time it releases a new title. The latest incarnation, Black Ops 4 , is a ridiculous, shockingly verbose blunderbuss of nonsense.

It features an interlocking RPG-lite class system, a boatload of lore, an eyebrow-raising alchemy mechanic. And yet, there's still an obstinate few who have decided, in their own private canon, that World at War is a cut above the rest.

This was hammered home to me when I stumbled into a Discord channel and met an year-old and a year-old who told me as much. Carnage reiterates that it's not necessarily a bad thing that Treyarch has iterated on that original Zombies mode, but then again, you only have your first love once. He also cites the colorful, still-active mod scene, where people continue to import custom maps into that dusty old IW3 engine. Call of Duty will trudge into an endless horizon; hundreds of developers on a ceaseless quest to impress new audiences, to reinvent the wheel.

I wonder how they would feel to know that there are many who are content, and will continue to be content, with just the way things are. Looking for something more modern?

Get the best gaming deals, reviews, product advice, competitions, unmissable gaming news and more! See comments. Gaming deals, prizes and latest news. Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands. Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors.